ChooseFI
Why does this Risk Parity fund in Fidelity FAPSX, show a big negative number?

Why does this Risk Parity fund in Fidelity FAPSX, show a big negative number?

At
ATreth · · 5 replies

I was looking at an asset allocation breakdown of various Fidelity funds I have. I noticed that there is a big negative number in the "Short Term" category for FAPSX, which is a Fidelity Risk Parity fund. What does that mean? If you add up the numbers in the bottom row, that is the current value of the holding (approximately $54,300). Anyone know what the "long, short, and net" values refer to?

Share
Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on Reddit
Share via Email
Copy link

Replies (5)

Dominic Leung

Dominic Leung

3 months ago

I am no expert, but I think a negative allocation means leverage.

ATreth

ATreth

3 months ago

Thanks to you both for your thoughts! I know this isn't the perfectly optimized fund, but it's only 2% of my investible assets - I'm just playing around a little. I was just curious about what these designations (long, short, net) mean in the Asset Allocation analysis on Fidelity. It only appeared here a couple weeks ago.

JoeQ17

JoeQ17

3 months ago

Risk Parity portfolio is very broad terminology and ones like this are not anywhere near what Uncle Frank and Tyler from Portfolio Charts talk about. The other commmentor gave you some details.

this is a good lesson to all on not purchasing an ETF or Mutual fund based on name. it’s a necessity to check the portfolio details of what’s actually inside it. Morningstar is great for this.

Are you looking to hold a full risk parity portfolio? Or just for intermediate duration??

TheCoffeeCup

TheCoffeeCup

3 months ago

FAPSX looks like a quant-fund, that is, its strategy is based on computer models, and it likely has many derivatives contracts (the short holdings). I'm by no means an investing expert -- so I may be wrong -- but it looks like when the fund's long assets are doing well, it incurs losses (premiums/fees) on the short positions. However, if the overall fund performance is positive, then the strategy may be working, and it looks like that's the case: the fund appears to be up 17% in the past year. If the long assets were doing poorly, the short positions would likely have positive earnings.

Showing 4 of 5 replies

View all replies on Community

Join the Discussion

Sign up to reply, follow discussions, and connect with the ChooseFI community.

Get Brad's weekly FI strategies — free

Join ChooseFI

Start your financial independence journey

  • Access to the ChooseFI community
  • Exclusive FI resources and tools
  • Weekly actionable insights
or

Already have an account? Log in

Try searching for

⌘K to open anytime

Your FI Journey

1/3

Step 1 of 3

How familiar are you with Financial Independence?