Looks like they need $50,000 a year to live on.
First of all, in my opinion people should almost always pull at least the standard deduction amount from traditional vehicles (IRA in your example). So that's $16,100. The decision is where to get the remaining $33,900. They could pull the rest from the brokerage and end up with a $0 tax bill for 3 years. But I think instead, they should pull another $12,400 from the traditional (filling up the 10% bracket) and the other $21,500 from the brokerage. That gives about 5 years of runway on the brokerage.
I'm thinking do a 5-year 72t for the $28,500 for the first 5 years. That puts them at age 50. Then to get to age 60 they can either do a Roth conversion ladder (pulling an additional $21,500 per year from the brokerage for the initial 5 years to do the conversion at the 12% bracket) with a 10-year 72t (for the remaining $28,100 a year), or just do a 10 year 72t for $50,000 a year.
The benefit of doing a 72t for only part of the needed spending is it allows significant flexibility with the remaining portion; you can think of the 72t as your "base", inflexible needs and the rest as variable spending that can be tightened up if the market does poorly. You'll have to make a decision about whether the higher taxes is worth the extra flexibility.
Ladder, age 45-50:
- 72t for $28,500/yr from IRA (to live on)
- conversion for $21,500/yr from IRA (for the ladder)
- $21,500/yr from brokerage (to live on)
- taxes: $4715/yr (probably less due to brokerage basis)
Ladder, age 50-60
- 72t for $28,500/yr from IRA (to live on)
- conversion for $21,500/yr from IRA (for the ladder)
- $21,500/yr from Roth (to live on)
- taxes: $3823/yr
No Ladder, age 45-50
- 72t for $28,500/yr from IRA (to live on)
- $21,500/yr from brokerage (to live on)
- taxes: $1240/yr (probably less due to brokerage basis)
No Ladder, age 50-60
- 72t for $50,000/yr (to live on)
- taxes: $3823/yr